Most Recent Posts

  • converted westy vans for sale july 2017

    published: Jul. 27, 2017

    Here is a list of Westfalia Vanagons listed for sale on the Internet with at least some form of engine conversion/upgrade


    titleenginepricecurrency
    subaru powered multivan - $24500 (Vancouver Island)early 90s Subaru 2.2$24500CDN
    1986 VW Vanagon Syncro Westfalia TDI 4X4 - $44000 (Shawnigan Lake)1.9 AHU TDI$44000CDN
    1985 Vanagon Westy 1.9 ALH TDI, 2wd with Limited Slip - $23000 (Reno)1.9 ALH TDI$23000USD
    1983 Volkswagen WestfaliaGoWesty 2.5 liter engine$38500USD
    1987 2.4L VANAGON FULL CAMPER 129K MILESGoWesty 2400cc waterboxer$32500USD
    Orange Burst Beauty Westfalia Restored with SubaruRebuilt Subaru 2.2$60000USD
    1985 Westfalia weekender subaru EJ22Subaru EJ22$24750USD
    1987 Subaru Converted Westfalia!94 Subaru Legacy 2.2L$19999USD
    85 syncro westfalia with subaru conversionSubaru 2003 Forester engine$47500CDN
    Restored 1985 Westfalia New Front AC with Subaru1994 Subaru Legacy$35000USD
    87 Syncro Westfalia Subaru Turbo Diesel-New Price2.0 Subaru boxer turbo diesel$57500USD
    1986 Syncro full westfalia camper with Subaru engSubaru 2.5 $43000USD
    Restored 1985 Westfalia Wolfsburg SubaruSubaru 2.2 $70000USD
    1989 Syncro Westfalia 165hp Subaru 2.5Subaru 2.5$50000USD
    1984 Subaru powered Westfalia full camperEJ25$22000USD
    1987 Syncro Westfalia Restored Subaru 3 KnobRebuilt 170 hp Subaru 2.5$55000USD
    1987 Westfalia with Subaru - 112k original milesSubaru is a 2.2 liter$29000USD
    1987 VW Westfalia Camper - $25500 (SE Portland) VW 1.9$25500USD
    1987 Volkswagen Bus/Vanagon westfalia Autresubaru 2,2L$19000CDN
    Westfalia 1989 Volkswagen GL Bus/Vanagon AutreSubaru Forester 2.5 Litres$22500CDN
    Westfalia 1984 subaru conversion. Ej25Subaru Forester 2.5$16500CDN
    1986 Volkswagen Bus/Vanagon Westfalia$18000USD
    1990 Volkswagen Bus/Vanagon GL2.1, New AMC Heads$19102USD
    1990 Volkswagen Bus/Vanagon WestfaliaTiico 2.0 l$29000USD
  • Barge loading rezoning application for the Hatzic region

    published: Nov. 14, 2014

    What's going on?

    The foundations of a large scale gravel barge loading operation are being laid in our backyard right now

    The district is proposing to rezone the riverfront property at the foot of Dewdney Trunk to allow the loading of barges.  The application proposes: "to rezone the subject property where barge loading has continued as a legally non-conforming use".
    Translation: they are already loading barges here so we're just going to tweak the zoning to reflect that.
    What it doesn't say is that this zoning will allow, without restriction, the loading of barges from the subject properties. 
    • no restriction on what can be loaded
    • no restriction on operating hours
    • no restrictions on the amount of material, number or size of barges
    As it turns out the owner of one of the properties also happens to own a large gravel mine up miracle valley.  It takes 100 trucks to fill just one barge.


    As a resident of the area you are probably well aware there is no barge loading operations currently underway at either property.  The best the respective owners could come up with when questioned by council was that every once in a while a barge is unloaded in the area.  Once it was some equipment being brought in and another time it was a house loaded on or off a barge.  
    The notion that this will simply recognize what is already happening on the property is disingenuous at best.
    • the application did not make it to 3rd reading due to the number of questions that were raised including habitat concerns over the sturgeon in the river nearby
    • there is still time to communicate to city hall your concerns even though public comment is 'officially' closed
    • an election is coming so with some public pressure we may be able to push the decision out passed the election when we may have a new council with a new vision for the region
    This should also be considered within the context of an aggregate pilot program the FVRD is currently undertaking
    FVRD - Gravel Operations Bylaw
    http://www.fvrd.bc.ca/InsidetheFVRD/CommunityPlanning/Pages/Gravel-Operations.aspx
    http://www.theprogress.com/news/146178445.html

    Problems with the process

    - there's a good chance you weren't even notified about this application.  The district only sent out notifications to residents within 150 meters of the property.  (Contrast this with the recent notification of rezoning application for the high density housing project on Hatzic lake)

    - this 'little' bylaw tweak will open the door to go from basically zero to unfettered gravel barge loading operations with very little consideration of the impact that may have on a large and well established neighbourhood.
    - this is old business from a previous council 
    - reset on this application after the election
    - the home owners in the Hatzic region have a stake in what happens on neighbouring properties.  There should be more opportunity for community input to the 
    - the district should withdraw the application and let the new council move forward with an opportunity for the community to have input
    Here is a recording of the public hearing from Nov. 3rd

    Some thoughts

    Maybe I'm just naive but this feels like a very old-school way of making major land-use decisions like this.
    If the landowners want to make a major change to the existing land use so close to a well established community like the Hatzic Bench region they should come through the front door, not the back-door, and address the concerns of local residents. 
    The Hatzic Bench community has been around a long time and there is too much at stake for the home-owners in the region to not have input into major decisions like this.
    Questions:
    • where are the economic benefits to Mission or Hatzic? - there are no new jobs or revenue or value add to a gravel loading terminal
    • has the district considered what something like this would do to local property values?
    • is industrial is the best zoning for those 2 properties at all?
    • - good low bank riverfront
    • Who benefits from this rezoning?
    • what safety measures are going to be?
    • has the city considered what happens if hundreds of trucks are turning into that intersection and rail line
    • - 25+\- trains a day

    What you can do

    1) email this or tell your neighbours
    2) email or phone the planning department at city hall and let them:
    • you don't support this rezoning application 
    • the district withdraw the application for the 2 properties 
    • let the next council have the opportunity to re-apply with more constructive input from all the stakeholders
    District of Mission Planning Department contact info:
    - Mike Younie - Director of Development Services
    - phone  604 820 3748
    - email planning@mission.ca

    As a community we need to send a message to city hall that there is a community here that has a stake in how the lands around here are developed.  We are paying attention

  • Initial thoughts along the angular journey

    published: Feb. 11, 2014
    So I'm a few weeks into my Angularjs immersion and it's been an enlightening road so far.  I am impressed with with what I've seen but there's a pretty steep drop off once you venture into the water though.  I finally feel like things are starting to come into focus which is a good thing.

    So in the spirit of 2014 and trying to publish more often I'm publishing my impressions and thoughts to this point fwiw.

    It seems there are lots of opinions around application architecture.

    After working with it for a while now I still have lots of questions but feel much more comfortable

    Similar to how you can 'cut your toes off' with node.js as well.  Backbone.js leaves a lot of opinionating up to you as well.

    Do all views get controllers? yes

    When to break something out into a directive

    Are directive controllers identical to stand alone controllers?

    What is the best way to manage template partials across features and layers?

    managing templates is the most frustrating part so far
    I want to load template partials into the template cache from template urls
    BINGO $http.get('third.html', {cache:$templateCache});

    so far I am leaning to use directives as my view containers.  I can't tell if this is an antipattern or a 'new' way of using Angularjs.  

    It feels both right and wrong at the same time (I must be on to something)

    just came across this article: 
    http://jan.varwig.org/archive/angularjs-views-vs-directives
    very timely.
  • Beware the dark themespublished: Oct. 11, 2013
  • Greenfinger App Requirements ver 1.0published: Sep. 29, 2013
  • why did I build thispublished: Sep. 29, 2013